![]() |
| Cat |
![]() |
| Cat: A closer look |
Is it cruel of me to laugh?
![]() |
| Cat |
![]() |
| Cat: A closer look |
This week the US House of Representatives considers the 2013 Farm Bill — the agriculture policy tool for the federal government. Of all of the amendments that will be debated, there is one in particular that has conservatives fuming. If passed, the “Egg Bill” amendment will result in an unfunded government mandate on thousands of American family farmers.
Battle of Bunker Hill, 1775. Known as Bunker Hill Day.Under the heading, "June 17: 'Don't Fire Until You See the Whites of Their Eyes'," Bennett (2) tells the bones of the story. British General Thomas Gage awakes in Boston and learns that two hills across the Charles River are "covered with Patriot troops and fortifications." Gage orders General William Howe to take the hills. Howe leads 2000 men with some drums and fifes up Breed's Hill. When the British were fewer than fifteen paces away, the Patriots fire. The British retreat, storm the hill again, and again retreat. The third time they find that the Patriots-- who had run out of ammo!-- were gone. About one-half of the British soldiers lost their lives. Four-hundred forty among the 3200 Patriots died.
The colonists, although defeated, proved that they were able to stand against the British regulars, so morally and historically the conflict was a victory for the united colonies. (1)
| Warren was 34 years old. |
| Immortality. If it weren't for some |
| "With each successive attempt, the outlook becomes clearer and more comprehensive, the meaning of the whole more pronounced." "... few or no pretensions to original research." Do tell. |
Julian Hawthorne (June 22, 1846 – July 21, 1934) was an American writer and journalist, the son of novelist Nathaniel Hawthorne and Sophia Peabody. He wrote numerous poems, novels, short stories, mystery/detective fiction, essays, travel books, biographies and histories. As a journalist he reported on the Indian Famine for Cosmopolitan magazine, and the Spanish-American War for the New York Journal.Julian also had some thoughts about incarceration:
In 1908, Hawthorne's old Harvard friend William J. Morton (a physician) invited Hawthorne to join in promoting some newly created mining companies in Ontario, Canada. Hawthorne made his writing and his family name central to the stock-selling campaigns. After complaints from shareholders, both Morton and Hawthorne were tried in New York City for mail fraud, and convicted in 1913.[9] Hawthorne was able to sell some three and a half million shares of stock in a nonexistent silver mine and served one year in the Atlanta Federal Penitentiary.[10]Anywhooo. It's supper time.
Upon his release from prison, he wrote The Subterranean Brotherhood (1914), a nonfiction work calling for an immediate end to incarceration of criminals. Hawthorne argued, based on his own experience, that incarceration was inhumane, and should be replaced by moral suasion. Of the fraud with which he was charged he always maintained his innocence.
| Here's how The Girls presented their tie-dyed Father's Day shirts to Mr. Big Food. |
Tie-dying family history is what The Girls do in their spare time. Click to enlarge.
|
The Farmer and His Sons
A Farmer, being at death's door, and desiring to impart to his sons a secret of much moment, called them around them and said, "My sons, I am shortly about to die. I would have you know, therefore, that in my vineyard lies a hidden treasure. Dig, and you will find it." As soon as their father was dead, the sons took spade and fork and turned up the soil if the vineyard over and over again, in their search for the treasure which they supposed to lie there. They found none, however: but the vines, after so thorough a digging, produced a crop as had never before been seen.
There is no treasure without toil.
Aesop
| I asked Rocky. |
| He may choose from among these, |
| or one of these. |
Parents who read their kids stories about happy, human-like animals like Franklin the Turtle or Arthur at bedtime are exposing their kids to racism, materialism, homophobia and patriarchal norms, according to a paper presented at the Congress of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
Most animals portrayed in children’s books, songs and on clothing send a bad message, according to academics Nora Timmerman and Julia Ostertag: That animals only exist for human use, that humans are better than animals, that animals don’t have their own stories to tell, that it’s fine to “demean” them by cooing over their cuteness. Perhaps worst of all, they say, animals are anthropomorphized to reinforce “socially dominant norms” like nuclear families and gender stereotypes.
![]() |
| Wonder if it's okay for grownups to read this story about "human-like animals?" |
| No one is watching me. |
The other day, my college age son quietly went around the house and put electricians tape over the camera lenses on the displays of all our home computers. I laughed when I discovered what he had done. . .then paused: after all, it wouldn’t be that hard for someone to remotely turn that camera on and secretly watch me and my family. I left the tape on. This is what it has come to. The revelations of recent days about the NSA being able to spy on the phone calls of millions of everyday Americans, without warrant, in search of a few possible terrorists has made everyone just a little more paranoid – and a little less trusting of the benign nature of our Federal government. The reality is that we may not yet be paranoid enough.Though, as this is The South, Miss M & I put a Southern spin on this high-tech counter-surveillance technique
| That's right. We used camo over blaze orange Duck Tape. |
![]() |
| That's what you thought you thought, George. We knew better. |
| Roy's the Boss |
| Seriously? You had to ask? |
![]() |
| The betweenness centrality scores of some |
Once again, I remind you that I know nothing of Mr Revere, or his conversations, or his habits or beliefs, his writings (if he has any) or his personal life. All I know is this bit of metadata, based on membership in some organizations. And yet my analytical engine, on the basis of absolutely the most elementary of operations in Social Networke Analysis, seems to have picked him out of our 254 names as being of unusual interest. We do not have to stop here, with just a picture. Now that we have used our simple “Person by Event” table to generate a “Person by Person” matrix, we can do things like calculate centrality scores, or figure out whether there are cliques, or investigate other patterns. For example, we could calculate a betweenness centrality measure for everyone in our matrix, which is roughly the number of “shortest paths” between any two people in our network that pass through the person of interest. It is a way of asking “If I have to get from person a to person z, how likely is it that the quickest way is through person x?”That's pulled from near the end of the article. Don't be put off by talk of tables and matrices. The author, Kieran Healy, does an awesome job of walking even the data-adverse through an analysis of a sample of metadata--nothing more than the names of 254 men, and their membership in one or more of seven organizations, that's all-- to uncover a treasure trove of information that culminates in a most interesting person of unusual interest.
The point is that I want to be governed by laws because every man is capable of being as short-sighted and stupid as me. And the evidence that some man — a Lincoln, even — did some good — the end of slavery, even – in contravention of those laws doesn’t change that.Because he should have said, "as I."
Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "And Speaking of Benjamin Franklin":Dear Dude,
I usеd to be ablе tо fіnd goοd
аdvice from youг aгticles.
Those who would give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safetyit was in June of 1752 that Franklin flew a kite (1).
![]() |
| 56 Traitors |
I would emphasize different words today.At The Volokh Conspiracy, Randy Barnett annotates the Declaration of Independence. His concise (e.g. doesn't take much time to at least skim through and come back to tomorrow when you have more time) article begins:When reading the Declaration, it is worth keeping in mind two very important facts. The Declaration constituted high treason against the Crown and every person who signed it would be executed as traitors should they be caught by the British. Second, the Declaration was considered to be a legal document by which the revolutionaries justified their actions, and explained why they were not truly traitors. It represented, as it were, a literal indictment of the Crown and Parliament, in the very same way that criminals are now publicly indicted for their alleged crimes by grand juries representing “the People.”
But to justify a revolution, it was not thought to be enough that officials of the government of England, the Parliament, or even the sovereign himself had violated the rights of the people. No government is perfect; all governments violate rights. This was well known. So the Americans had to allege more than mere violations of rights. They had to allege nothing short of a criminal conspiracy to violate their rights systematically. Hence, the famous reference to “a long train of abuses and usurpations” and the list that follows. In some cases, these specific complaints account for provisions eventually included in the Constitution and Bill of Rights.It ends:The assumption of natural rights expressed in the Declaration of Independence can be summed up by the following proposition: “first comes rights, then comes government.” According to this view: (1) the rights of individuals do not originate with any government, but preexist its formation; (2) The protection of these rights is the first duty of government; and (3) Even after government is formed, these rights provide a standard by which its performance is measured and, in extreme cases, its systemic failure to protect rights — or its systematice violation of rights — can justify its alteration or abolition; (4) At least some of these rights are so fundamental that they are “inalienable,” meaning they are so intimately connected to one’s nature as a human being that they cannot be transferred to another even if one consents to do so. This is powerful stuff.[my emphases]
| Clockwise from top left: Ham Salad, Pheasant Salad, Egg Salad, Grapes |
![]() |
| And we happened upon this scene as we returned. |
![]() |
| Ghost Busters! We should view that movie again this summer. |